• Mon - Fri : 8:00 - 16:00
  • valdymas@valdymasintelligence.org
  • Mansfield, Texas, 76063, USA
Facebook X-twitter Youtube Instagram
Valdymas Intelligence improves outcomes and transform minds
GET THE BOOK

Unleashing Student Potential: Applying COVA Principles to Math Instruction on a Digital Platform

COVA stands for Choice, Ownership, Voice, and Authenticity, a set of educational principles aimed at enhancing student engagement and promoting meaningful learning experiences leveraging digital platforms for driving personalized learning. I wished I had learnt mathematics in this age of digital learning. My 6-year-old daughter had answered over 2,500 maths practice questions in two weeks on IXL for her next grade, which is grade 1. More than all the practice questions in my own mathematics textbook as a 12-year-old in Junior High School. She dedicates about 3 hours daily and enjoys the different progress she is making in understanding different mathematical concepts. These are unprecedented times, where digital and personalized learning can make lot of difference in the knowledge of Mathematics. These principles emphasize giving students the autonomy to make decisions about their learning (Choice), fostering a sense of responsibility for their educational outcomes (Ownership), encouraging students to express their unique perspectives (Voice), and creating learning experiences that are relevant and meaningful to the real world (Authenticity) (Harapnuik, 2018).

Applying COVA principles to math instruction can significantly transform the learning experience, making math more engaging, relevant, and applicable to students’ lives. This approach aligns with modern educational philosophies that prioritize student-centered learning and aim to develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills.Your interest in applying the COVA principles (Choice, Ownership, Voice, and Authority) to math instruction aligns with a growing movement towards empowering students in their learning journey. Let’s delve into the potential of this approach and explore how it can transform math education.

The COVA Framework:

The COVA framework emphasizes student agency and active participation in the learning process. Here’s how each principle can be applied in math instruction:

Authority: Gradually grant students authority over their learning by allowing them to make choices about their math projects, design experiments, or even co-create classroom rules and expectations (Boyle, 2017). To integrate authenticity in math instruction, teachers can design tasks and projects that simulate real-world scenarios where mathematical concepts are applied. This could include activities like analyzing statistical data, solving engineering problems, or managing budgets.
Example: Real-World Math Problems: Students could work on projects that require them to analyze data from community surveys, design cost-effective solutions for real-world problems, or use mathematical modeling to predict outcomes in various fields such as finance or environmental science (Savery, 2006).

Choice: Provide students with options in how they approach mathematical concepts. This could involve allowing them to choose problem-solving strategies, selecting relevant data for analysis, or deciding on the format of their presentations (Steele, 2017). In math instruction, providing choice can involve allowing students to select from various problem sets or real-world scenarios that they find interesting and relevant. For instance, students might choose to explore mathematical concepts through projects that involve financial planning, engineering challenges, or statistical analysis related to their interests.
Example: Project-Based Learning: Students could choose to work on a project that involves creating a budget for a community event or designing a blueprint for a sustainable building. This not only makes math more engaging but also demonstrates its practical applications in everyday life (Grant, 2011).

Ownership: Foster a sense of ownership by encouraging students to set personal learning goals, track their progress, and reflect on their learning journey. This empowers them to take responsibility for their mathematical development (Paris & Zimmerman, 2014). In math, ownership can be encouraged by allowing students to set their learning goals, track their progress, and reflect on their learning experiences. Teachers can support this by providing tools and frameworks that help students plan their learning paths and self-assess their understanding of mathematical concepts.
Example: Personalized Learning Plans: Students could develop personalized learning plans where they identify their strengths and weaknesses in math, set specific goals, and create action plans to achieve those goals. Regular reflection and self-assessment can help them stay on track and take ownership of their learning (Dabbagh & Kitsantas, 2012).

Voice: Create a safe space for students to express their mathematical thinking, ask questions, and challenge ideas. Encourage collaborative discussions and peer learning to enrich understanding (Boaler, 2016). Incorporating voice in math instruction can involve allowing students to present their solutions to problems in creative ways, participate in class discussions about mathematical concepts, and provide feedback on the learning process. This can be facilitated through activities like collaborative problem-solving, peer teaching, and math journals.
Example: Math Journals: Students can use math journals to document their problem-solving processes, reflect on their learning, and articulate their understanding of concepts. This practice not only helps students deepen their comprehension but also provides teachers with insights into their thought processes and challenges (Borasi & Rose, 1989).

Benefits of COVA in Math Class:

Empowering students through COVA principles can lead to several benefits:

Develop Lifelong Learners: COVA fosters a sense of agency and responsibility for learning, preparing students to become independent and lifelong learners (Paris & Zimmerman, 2014).

Increased Engagement: Choice and ownership foster intrinsic motivation, leading to deeper engagement with math concepts (Deci & Ryan, 2000).

Improved Problem-Solving Skills: When students have a voice and authority, they are more likely to explore different strategies and develop critical thinking skills (Boaler, 2016).

Greater Confidence: Taking ownership and experiencing success cultivates self-efficacy, leading to increased confidence in math abilities (Schunk & Pintrich, 2004).

Implementation Strategies:

Here are some practical strategies for implementing COVA principles in math instruction:

  • Choice Boards:Present students with various activities or problems to solve, allowing them to choose based on their interests or preferred learning styles.
  • Open-Ended Tasks:Incorporate projects or problems that have multiple solutions or require creative approaches.
  • Student-Led Discussions:Facilitate discussions where students explain their solutions, encouraging peer feedback and collaborative problem-solving.
  • Self-Assessment Tools:Provide students with rubrics or reflection prompts to evaluate their understanding and identify areas for improvement.

Conclusion:

The COVA framework offers a compelling approach to transform math education from a teacher-centered to a student-centered experience. By empowering students to take ownership, make choices, and have a voice in their learning, educators can unlock their potential and foster a love of mathematics that extends beyond the classroom.

Bibliography

  1. Boaler, J. (2016). Mindset mathematics: Encouraging growth mindsets in mathematics classrooms. John Wiley & Sons.
  2. Borasi, R., & Rose, B. J. (1989). Journal Writing and Mathematics Instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20(4), 347-365. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00315606
  3. Boyle, M. (2017). Student autonomy in the classroom: Theory, pedagogy, and practice. Routledge.
  4. Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, Social Media, and Self-Regulated Learning: A Natural Formula for Connecting Formal and Informal Learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
  5. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/SDT/documents/2000_DeciRyan_PIWhatWhy.pdf
  6. Grant, M. M. (2011). Learning, Beliefs, and Products: Students’ Perspectives with Project-Based Learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(2), 37-69. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1254
  7. Harapnuik, D., & Thibodeaux, T. (2016). COVA + CSLE: A New Approach to Educating Learners. Faculty Focus. Retrieved from https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/teaching-and-learning/cova-csles-new-approach-educating-learners/
  8. Paris, S., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2014). Motivational learning theory and practice. Routledge.
  9. Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of Problem-Based Learning: Definitions and Distinctions. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002
  10. Schunk, D. H., & Pintrich, P. R. (2004). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Merrill Prentice Hall.
  11. Steele, C. M. (2017). Whistling Vivaldi and other illusions of destiny. W. W. Norton & Company.
sign in
sign in
Shopping Cart
Scroll to Top